Skip Navigation

This Lesson Plan is a part of the EDCollection:

Duration
30-60 minutes
Topic(s)
  • Journalism
Grade(s)
  • 6-12

  1. In advance, select a news story for students to research. (Depending on your angle for this topic, you may want to choose a real news story, a fake/questionable story, or both.) You also may allow them to choose their own news story.
  2. Ask students how they determine whether information they find online is trustworthy.
  3. Introduce the E.S.C.A.P.E. acronym by writing the six key concepts on the board or projecting the poster. Explain that considering even one of these six concepts can help determine whether information is credible.
  4. Explain that they will focus on source for this activity. Looking at the source means looking at who made or otherwise contributed to this story and trying to determine if they are trustworthy.
  5. Divide students into pairs, or allow them to work individually. Distribute a news story for them to research or give them 5 minutes to find their own. Have each group take 5 minutes to read and summarize the news story.
  6. Then, give students 10-15 minutes to answer the questions concerning the publication and writer of the original article and determine how much they trust the publication and writer.
  7. Next, they should take 10-15 minutes to investigate the sources within the article. This is a tight timeline, but push groups to work quickly and broadly rather than getting bogged down.
  8. Have groups/students share their findings. As a class, decide if the story or stories is/are trustworthy.

  • Can I Trust the Creators? worksheet (download), one per student
  • E.S.C.A.P.E. Junk News poster (download)
  • Internet access,
  • A news story to evaluate in which at least two individuals provided information to the writer(s)

  • Lesson Plan - Can I Trust the Creators?
  • Worksheet - Can I Trust the Creators?
  • E.S.C.A.P.E. Junk News poster

To request a large print or Braille version, call 202.292.6650.

  1. After reading the story once, could you make a determination about the reliability of the source? Why or why not?
  2. Were you able to determine if the publication and/or writer were reliable? Why or why not?
  3. What information was most helpful to determining the publication’s reliability? The writer’s reliability? Explain.
  4. What made sources within the article trustworthy? What made you question them? Explain.
  5. Would you be more or less likely to trust information from a source that wanted to remain anonymous? Why?

   

More from our EDCollections

Explore more content within this EDCollection, or browse through all of our Lesson Plans, Critical Debates, Themes, Exhibits, Digital Artifacts, Historical Events, Videos, and Interactives using our EDTool search.
Quick View
Keep in the loop!

Sign up for NewseumED updates and newsletter today.