Skip Navigation

This Critical Debate is a part of the EDCollection:

Get even more great free content!

This content contains copyrighted material that requires a free NewseumED account.

Registration is fast, easy, and comes with 100% free access to our vast collection of videos, artifacts, interactive content, and more.

Sign Up
?

NewseumED is provided as a free educational resource and contains copyrighted material. Registration is required for full access. Signing up is simple and free.

or log in to your account

With a free NewseumED account, you can:

  • Watch timely and informative videos
  • Access expertly crafted lesson plans
  • Download an array of classroom resources
  • and much more!

This Critical Debate is part of a Debate Comparison:

See all Debate Comparisons
Duration
30-60 minutes
Topic(s)
  • Constitution
  • National Security
  • Supreme Court
  • Vietnam War
Grade(s)
  • 9-12
  • College/University

Does freedom of press include the right to print classified information about controversial government actions?

The United States is embroiled in a war in Vietnam that has claimed thousands of service members’ lives. At home, the American public remains locked in a heated debate over whether the U.S. should continue fighting the war, as there remains no end in sight.

The secretary of defense has assembled a team of 30-40 people – government officials, civilian and military – to secretly study the history of U.S. policy in Vietnam. The study finds four consecutive presidents have supported the war, despite having information that the U.S. is suffering heavy losses and unlikely to win. The presidents have lied to the public and Congress.

One of the team members, Daniel Ellsberg, becomes convinced that the American public needs to see the report. He secretly photocopies and shares it with The New York Times. The newspaper’s legal team warns that publishing classified government information could violate the law, but the publisher decides to proceed. On June 13, 1971, the Times begins publishing a series of articles on the Pentagon Papers.

The government gets a restraining order to temporarily halt publication of further stories and the Times sues. Legal teams on both sides prepare their arguments for a high-stakes debate over freedom of the press and national security.

Take the role of a historical figure below and find evidence to argue your case.

  1. Daniel Ellsberg, Military Analyst and Pentagon Papers Source
    ?
    Daniel Ellsberg knew leaking classified information was illegal, but believed the U.S. government had not been honest with the public about the Vietnam War.
    The Associated Press

    Daniel Ellsberg, defense consultant working on the Pentagon Papers

    The American public has a right to know about its government’s actions, especially in the case of controversial actions that directly affect the people. Keeping those actions secret is wrong, and I am willing to break the law to prove this point.

    “What these studies tell me is we must remember this is a self-governing country. We are the government. And in terms of institutions, the Constitution provides for separation for powers, for Congress, for the courts, informally for the press, protected by the First Amendment. … I think we cannot let the officials of the executive branch determine for us what it is that the public needs to know about how well and how they are discharging their functions.”

    — Interview with Walter Cronkite on June 23, 1971
  2. 'New York Times' Publisher Arthur Ochs Sulzberger
    ?
    Arthur Ochs Sulzberger believed in the responsibility of the free press to serve as a watchdog, reporting on the government and informing the public.
    The Associated Press

    Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Sr., publisher of 'The New York Times'

    The press has a responsibility to keep the government in check and inform the public about what is happening in their democracy. If the Pentagon Papers are true, we should make them public; it doesn’t matter how they were obtained.

    “This was not a breach of the national security. We gave away no national secrets. We didn’t jeopardize any American soldiers or Marines overseas. [If you’re the government] it’s a wonderful way if you’ve got egg on your face to prevent anybody from knowing it, stamp it secret and put it away.”

    — The New York Times, June 17, 1971
  3. Solicitor General Erwin Griswold
    ?
    As U.S. solicitor general, Erwin Griswold was responsible for representing the government before the Supreme Court in the Pentagon Papers case.
    Martha Stewart/Courtesy of Historical & Special Collections, Harvard Law School Library

    U.S. Solicitor General Erwin Griswold

    The government must have the ability to decide which information is too sensitive to be shared with the public. At a time of war, releasing certain information could negatively affect war efforts or even cost lives, and the press should not be free to judge what information is acceptable to publish without any government input.

    “I haven't the slightest doubt myself that the material which has already been published and the publication of the other materials affect American lives and is a thoroughly serious matter. I think to say that it can only be enjoined if there will be a war tomorrow morning, when there is a war now going on, is much too narrow."

    — Griswold in his oral arguments before the Supreme Court, 1971

  • Who stands to benefit from publishing the Pentagon Papers? Who could be harmed?

  • What are the dangers of using leaked information?

  • What issues should The New York Times consider in deciding whether to publish the classified material?

  • Why would the U.S. government not want the study published?

  • How might the government or news media be emboldened by a court decision in its favor?

  • What does the public have a right to know? What does the public need to know? Who should be making those decisions?

More from our EDCollections

Explore more content within this EDCollection, or browse through all of our Lesson Plans, Critical Debates, Themes, Exhibits, Digital Artifacts, Historical Events, Videos, and Interactives using our EDTool search.
Quick View

Related EDClasses & Training

  • First Amendment and Tinker

    Students learn about the groundbreaking 1969 Supreme Court case that protected student speech in public schools.

  • Free Press in America

    Through a case-study format, participants learn about the five freedoms of the First Amendment, limits to the freedom of the press and discuss modern day challenges driven by new technologies.

  • Introduction to the First Amendment

    Students get a brief overview of the First Amendment rights and limits, and discuss what life would be like without them.

Keep in the loop.

Sign up for NewseumED updates and newsletter today.