Skip Navigation

Get even more great free content!

This content contains copyrighted material that requires a free NewseumED account.

Registration is fast, easy, and comes with 100% free access to our vast collection of videos, artifacts, interactive content, and more.

Sign Up
?

NewseumED is provided as a free educational resource and contains copyrighted material. Registration is required for full access. Signing up is simple and free.

or log in to your account

With a free NewseumED account, you can:

  • Watch timely and informative videos
  • Access expertly crafted lesson plans
  • Download an array of classroom resources
  • and much more!
Duration
30 minutes
Topic(s)
  • Journalism
  • Media Ethics
  • National Security
Grade(s)
  • 7-12
  • College/University

  1. Pass out copies of the case study and have students discuss it in small groups. Tell the groups they should attempt to come to a consensus about which of the multiple choice options they think is the best. They may come up with another position.
  2. Ask the groups to share out their choice and reasoning. Use the questions to guide the discussion.

  • The Ambassador's Journal handout (download), one per student or small group

  • What overarching morals or values might be taken into account for each option?
  • Was it OK to remove the diary from what some government officials called a “crime scene”? Does it matter that the building was largely unsecured, allowing the reporter to enter it?
  • If you were the network, how might you justify publishing the contents of the journal against the family’s wishes?
  • Why might the government try to prevent the network from publishing the contents of the journal?
  • Does the nature of the ambassador’s death make a difference in the decision to publish the diary?
  • Does the public have a right to know of the ambassador’s security concerns and how such concerns may have been a factor in his death?
  • Is privacy of the deceased ambassador and/or his family an issue? Explain.
  • What are some political consequences of publishing the concerns expressed in the diary? Should they be taken into account when deciding to publish or not? 

Explore More Lesson Plans

Quick View

Related EDClasses & Training

  • Media Ethics for Students

    Is it OK to clean up a quote or broadcast unconfirmed information? Students become more critical consumers of news media by examining real-life case studies of journalists striving to be accurate, fair and clear.

  • Photo Ethics

    Students become more critical consumers of visual information by examining real-life case studies of photojournalists striving to be accurate, fair and clear.

  • Is It Fair? Evaluate Your Media

    Are accusations of bias clogging your news feed? Are your students quick to point out that something's unfair — but not as ready to explain why? Tune up your “fairness meter” to assess how objective or biased content really is.

Keep in the loop.

Sign up for NewseumED updates and newsletter today.