Skip Navigation

Oh no, you’re missing out on great content!

This content contains copyrighted material that requires a free NewseumED account.

Registration is simple — and comes with full access to videos, artifact, interactives, shareable content, and more.

Sign Up
?

NewseumED is provided as a free educational resource and contains copyrighted material. Registration is required for full access. Signing up is simple and free.

or log in to your account

Once you create a free account, 
you’ll have access to:

  • Downloads
  • Videos and Artifacts
  • Interactives
  • and more!
Duration
30-60 minutes
Topic(s)
  • Constitution
  • Supreme Court
Grade(s)
  • 7-12

  1. In advance, review the Balancing Rights: The Case of Lee v. Weisman  teacher background sheet in lesson plan download. If desired, additional case background for Lee v. Weisman on Oyez: http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1991/1991_90_1014
  2. Distribute the worksheet.
  3. Individually or in groups, have students read the summary of the case and answer the questions.
  4. Discuss their answers, then reveal and discuss the court’s decision. (See the accompanying teacher background sheet for more information.) Throughout the discussion, encourage students to cite cases or facts they have learned from their First Amendment studies.

  •  Balancing Rights: The Case of Lee v. Weisman worksheet (download), one per student

Before revealing the Supreme Court’s ruling:

  • What rights are you balancing in this case?
  • How should the principal defend the practice of hosting a clergy member to lead a prayer? How should the student’s father argue against it?
  • Does it matter whether attendance is required to receive a diploma? What about whether requirements to stand or kneel or otherwise observe the prayer? Why? What if the prayer were led by the principal? By a student?

After revealing the Supreme Court’s ruling:

  • How did the Supreme Court balance rights in this case?
  • Do you agree or disagree with this ruling? Why?
  • What is coercion? Why is the concept of coercion important to this case? What do you think should constitute coercion?
  • Following this ruling, some public schools have chosen to have an additional graduation event where non-denominational and non-sectarian prayers led by local clergy are part of the program. What do you think about this practice?
  • 1992 was more than 20 years ago. Do you think the Supreme Court would rule the same way on this case today? Why or why not?

 Organize a class debate about the case. Before revealing the how the Supreme Court ruled on this case, divide the class into two; one side will argue that the Supreme Court should rule that the prayer is protected by the First Amendment; the other half will argue that the Supreme Court should rule that the prayer is not protected by the First Amendment. Break each half of the class into several small groups. Each group will present its strongest argument for or against First Amendment protection in the debate. Allow them class time to begin brainstorming arguments, or assign this as homework. In the following class period, alternate groups from each half of the class, presenting arguments for and against First Amendment protection. At the end of the debate, take a vote to see how the class would rule on the case. (You may wish to ask parents or other teachers to be a guest judge and jury.) Reveal the Supreme Court’s ruling and discuss using the questions above.

Explore More Lesson Plans

Quick View

Related EDClasses & Training

  • First Amendment and Tinker

    Students learn about the groundbreaking 1969 Supreme Court case that protected student speech in public schools.

  • Introduction to the First Amendment

    Students get a brief overview of the First Amendment rights and limits, and discuss what life would be like without them.

  • You Can’t Say That in School?!

    Students debate court cases to learn how far First Amendment protections extend in public schools, and why limits may be necessary.

Keep in the loop.

Sign up for NewseumED updates and newsletter today.